@
mfansler28
Without question, it's the responsibility of the coach to know the rules, and as I said above, the responsbility of the coach to submit entries that athletes can handle. In reading your comments, two things seem pretty clear.
First, the rules were clearly followed and your coach is clearly also not familiar enough with those rules - at least as they pertain to PV. Asking for the bar to be lowered at a Championship meet is the equivalent of stopping a meet to ask whether your kid can be switched from lane 8 to lane 4. I don't think you see this as an excuse as much as you were simply complaining about it, but it's very common for meets to bend or even ignore rules during the regular season. E.g., I know a few coaches who think mandatory blocks in the 400 is a dumb rule, so there are times when we run meets where we leave "blocks" in the 400 as optional. If one of the girls I coach never ends up using blocks in any 400 race during the season, however, it's on me when we get to State and she has no clue how to use those blocks.
Second, your coach miscalculated your daughter's ability to perform in the events where she was entered. Plenty of coaches seem to look at entries in terms of what an athlete is good at, but fail to account for how those entries are likely to go on the day of the meet. E.g., we had a HJer who made State that had been running on our 4 x 200 all season long. When our 4 x 200 made it to State, I had to consider whether this girl could handle running back and forth during her event - most likely at a point where she started reaching the scoring heights in HJ. We decided it wasn't worth the risk, so we substituted a girl for her on the relay. Your coach may very well have put a lot of thought into his/her entries, but in my opinion still miscalculated your daughter's ability to shuttle herself around. That's obviously a great learning experience for everyone though as she moves forward.
Although I think the "you aren't in it for the kids" comment is valid in some cases, that kind of comment is usually made by people who don't get their way on something, and in some cases by people who expect the world to revolve around them and only them. I'm not saying that's what you're doing here, not at all, I'm speaking generally. What's assumed is that people should bend over backwards, overlook rule violations, etc, etc, etc, so that kids who can't or don't follow the rules can still compete. At times, that's a good thing. E.g., in some low key dual meet, I think you do whatever you can within reason to ensure that athletes get their opportunities. If the 4 kids on one relay team don't have matching uniforms, then oh well, I say let 'em run. That changes when you get to big meets or championship events. Just because the officials might tell that same relay team they can't run unless their uniforms match, however, it doesn't mean the official hates kids or isn't in it for the kids. The best possible competitive environment is where everyone is held to the same standard, and everyone knows in advance what that standard will be.
One extension of the "you aren't in it for the kids" comment is over the demeanor and professionalism of officials. In all honesty, pointing out that there are officials who act like big fish in a little pond is not exactly the equivalent of discovering a new planet or finding a cure for cancer. We all know it, it's not exactly revelatory news. So yes, while there are officials who act as though their $30 stipend and free Gatorades are conditioned on an ability to intimidate HS girls at check-in, the overwhelming majority do an exceptional job and really act like they care. Putting myself in their place, I wouldn't want to do the job, because I doubt I could avoid using my non-sarcastic, slightly condescending voice in situations where - for example - a coach asked me to lower the bar in PV. In that regard, a multitude of officials are better people than I'll ever be.
